Understand before deciding

How far should we let AI advance?

Three questions. No prescribed right answer. We’ll suggest a path through the arguments, objections, and possible responses.

Begin · 2 minutes

Your starting point

Where do you stand today?

Your answers stay in this browser. They are not sent to us or connected to an account.

AI poses a genuine existential risk.
01

AI poses a genuine existential risk.

A pause or treaty could materially reduce that risk.
02

A pause or treaty could materially reduce that risk.

International coordination is politically achievable—countries can agree, comply, and enforce it.
03

International coordination is politically achievable—countries can agree, comply, and enforce it.

Explore the case

Start where you have questions.

Everything remains available. Your answers only change the suggested order.

Understand the risk

Why do researchers discuss existential risk?

A starting point on loss of control, uncertainty, and why the risk deserves serious attention.

Read the source overview

Source: PauseAI

Evaluate responses

What would a pause actually mean?

What would pause, what would continue, and how a pause differs from a blanket ban on AI.

Examine the proposal

Source: PauseAI

Test coordination

Could a global treaty be verified?

The case involving advanced chips, compute centres, inspection, compliance, and defection.

Explore the mechanisms

Source: PauseAI

Move toward action

Why a visible constituency matters

Policymakers can be convinced without acting. A credible constituency changes what they can defend.

Read the strategy

Source: PauseAI / LessWrong

From curiosity to capacity

Keep a private record of the steps you take.

Create an account to record a reading, conversation, event, or representative contact. Nothing is public.

Create an account